<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>757 Hampton Roads: A Greater Region. A Greater Life. &#187; SGA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://757hamptonroads.com/tag/sga/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://757hamptonroads.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 02:25:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Virginia Beach Comprehensive Plan</title>
		<link>http://757hamptonroads.com/2009/11/10/virginia-beach-comprehensive-plan/</link>
		<comments>http://757hamptonroads.com/2009/11/10/virginia-beach-comprehensive-plan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 11:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>757HR</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Developmental Sprawl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Light Rail Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Local Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smart Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Urban Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Beach Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Burton Station]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comprehensive Plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[form-based zoning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Density]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Light Rail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norfolk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Redevelopment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SGA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strategic growth area]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Beach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zoning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://757hamptonroads.com/?p=505</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While reviewing the Final Draft of the City of Virginia Beach&#8217;s Comprehensive Plan, my initial reaction was a positive one. A number of their so-called &#8220;Strategic Growth Areas&#8221; (SGA) were planned to have increased density with a focus on mixed use and mass transit. They even discussed a switch to the use of Form-Based Zoning [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p id="top" />While reviewing the Final Draft of the City of Virginia Beach&#8217;s Comprehensive Plan, my initial reaction was a positive one. A number of their so-called &#8220;Strategic Growth Areas&#8221; (SGA) were planned to have increased density with a focus on mixed use and mass transit. They even discussed a switch to the use of Form-Based Zoning in the SGAs. Unfortunately, they failed to follow through on their own recommendations. They start out with comments such as, &#8220;Instead of relying on the remaining inventory of underdeveloped land to absorb growth, the City carefully defined areas planned to accommodate and absorb urban growth called ‘Strategic Growth Areas.’&#8221; Then they define characteristics of the &#8216;Urban Area&#8217; in the SGAs. Among these characteristics are &#8220;higher density residential uses&#8221; and &#8220;absence of single-family detached units.&#8221; This is interesting, mainly because in the first SGA defined in the plan, Burton Station, has the Planning Department making this very contradictory recommendation: &#8220;Respect and retain the existing houses in the neighborhood along Burton Station Road and <strong>maintain the low density character of this neighborhood</strong>.&#8221; (Emphasis added) Now, I understand the need to respect the people that live there, but the majority of this SGA is industrial. The small amount of land that has potential to be redeveloped is made up of a trailer park, woods, fields, and mud holes. In fact, aside from the trailer park, there is no technical &#8216;neighborhood&#8217; in existence here. It is no more than a rural road with fewer than 20 homes and approximately 30 residents.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;">[googlemaps http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&amp;amp;source=s_q&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;geocode=&amp;amp;q=norfolk+va&amp;amp;sll=37.0625,-95.677068&amp;amp;sspn=48.956293,112.763672&amp;amp;ie=UTF8&amp;amp;t=h&amp;amp;hq=&amp;amp;hnear=Norfolk,+Virginia&amp;amp;ll=36.885456,-76.191945&amp;amp;spn=0.012014,0.018239&amp;amp;z=15&amp;amp;output=embed&amp;w=425&amp;h=350]</p>
<p>Does this mean the city wants to maintain the trailer park? Yeah, right. According to the actual Burton Station plan from the Planning Department, even the options that keep it low density force the residents to move. In fact, according to the Burton Station plan, the City of Virginia Beach would work to reconfigure the Lake Wright golf course (City of Norfolk property) into the Burton Station area and then create a golf course community around it. How is a golf course community fit in with their Urban vision?</p>
<p>Overall, I applaud their effort and most of their plan. The new form-based zoning code will certainly curb sprawl as long as the city sticks to it. Sticking to it is going to require increasing density as density increases. In fact, if Virginia Beach can stick to this way of zoning, they will be catering less to suburbanism than Norfolk. Norfolk still has the older, suburban zoning, which is completely contrary to urban density. Good job Virginia Beach and keep up the good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://757hamptonroads.com/2009/11/10/virginia-beach-comprehensive-plan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
