<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for 757 Hampton Roads: A Greater Region. A Greater Life.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://757hamptonroads.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://757hamptonroads.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 22:11:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Building To Be Demo&#8217;d for LRT by t1ewis</title>
		<link>http://757hamptonroads.com/2010/11/11/building-to-be-demod-for-lrt/comment-page-1/#comment-3680</link>
		<dc:creator>t1ewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 22:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://757hamptonroads.com/?p=978#comment-3680</guid>
		<description>so much hate for light rail.  i mean i know there&#039;s gonna be snafu&#039;s (for lack of better words) in constructing and maintaining any rapid transit.  but u know i just wish Norfolk and hopefully VB will just take the bull by the horns and slam that son of a gun down, cuz they&#039;re running this thing not the citizens.  it&#039;s amazing that they haven&#039;t even opened this thing and a jillion people are still whining and complaining and making lawsuits and other claims.  i hope that when they do decide to start expanding (even though it&#039;s prolly only gonna be on the southside.  yes i have no faith in the leaders on the peninsula, especially Hampton) they start manning up and taking this stuff on full blast or else the whining-complainy-backwoods-stuck in neutral citizens are gonna prevent any progress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so much hate for light rail.  i mean i know there&#8217;s gonna be snafu&#8217;s (for lack of better words) in constructing and maintaining any rapid transit.  but u know i just wish Norfolk and hopefully VB will just take the bull by the horns and slam that son of a gun down, cuz they&#8217;re running this thing not the citizens.  it&#8217;s amazing that they haven&#8217;t even opened this thing and a jillion people are still whining and complaining and making lawsuits and other claims.  i hope that when they do decide to start expanding (even though it&#8217;s prolly only gonna be on the southside.  yes i have no faith in the leaders on the peninsula, especially Hampton) they start manning up and taking this stuff on full blast or else the whining-complainy-backwoods-stuck in neutral citizens are gonna prevent any progress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on HRBT, US460 Both Get Private Proposals by t1ewis</title>
		<link>http://757hamptonroads.com/2010/10/30/hrbt-us460-both-get-private-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-3377</link>
		<dc:creator>t1ewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2010 20:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://757hamptonroads.com/?p=972#comment-3377</guid>
		<description>what&#039;s funny to me is that despite all the efforts and fight that was put up for The Tide.  and almost equally as much for the extension to VB.  after all the mentioning, discussing, recommending, suggesting, heck even some planning and visioning of mass transit across the region, they still settle for more roads.  these have to be some of the most stubborn, backwards individuals i&#039;ve ever seen in my life.  how do they think this Region is ever gonna progress by the poor decisions that they make?  so what, is rapid transit only gonna be on an individual city bases now?  u know they can get LRT and HSR with PPP.  they can get the fares to be lowered too just like the tolls.  i give up</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what&#8217;s funny to me is that despite all the efforts and fight that was put up for The Tide.  and almost equally as much for the extension to VB.  after all the mentioning, discussing, recommending, suggesting, heck even some planning and visioning of mass transit across the region, they still settle for more roads.  these have to be some of the most stubborn, backwards individuals i&#8217;ve ever seen in my life.  how do they think this Region is ever gonna progress by the poor decisions that they make?  so what, is rapid transit only gonna be on an individual city bases now?  u know they can get LRT and HSR with PPP.  they can get the fares to be lowered too just like the tolls.  i give up</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Off Topic by t1ewis</title>
		<link>http://757hamptonroads.com/off-topic/comment-page-2/#comment-3364</link>
		<dc:creator>t1ewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 15:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://757hamptonroads.wordpress.com/?page_id=239#comment-3364</guid>
		<description>I know ur gonna do an article on the latest developments for the HRBT expansion?  my thing is, why isn&#039;t mass transit be consider/included?  and if the citizens speak on it (not a whole lot anyway) would they change it to include some kind of mass transit?  it&#039;s like the thought of expanding mass transit in the this region is taboo.  only Norfolk and VA beach think about it but are limited to their cities.  not saying they don&#039;t want to expand it across the 757 but they don&#039;t seem to nudge the leaders in the pennisula enough.  all they do is disagree.  i hate it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know ur gonna do an article on the latest developments for the HRBT expansion?  my thing is, why isn&#8217;t mass transit be consider/included?  and if the citizens speak on it (not a whole lot anyway) would they change it to include some kind of mass transit?  it&#8217;s like the thought of expanding mass transit in the this region is taboo.  only Norfolk and VA beach think about it but are limited to their cities.  not saying they don&#8217;t want to expand it across the 757 but they don&#8217;t seem to nudge the leaders in the pennisula enough.  all they do is disagree.  i hate it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My Trip to Portland by t1ewis</title>
		<link>http://757hamptonroads.com/2010/10/23/my-trip-to-portland/comment-page-1/#comment-3308</link>
		<dc:creator>t1ewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 23:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://757hamptonroads.com/?p=961#comment-3308</guid>
		<description>i agree.  i have a feeling that people will find it as a nice way to at least commute around Downtown.  when they see the convenience of it, they&#039;ll realize they want it all around Norfolk and eventually around the region for that matter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree.  i have a feeling that people will find it as a nice way to at least commute around Downtown.  when they see the convenience of it, they&#8217;ll realize they want it all around Norfolk and eventually around the region for that matter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Economist Says LRT Cost Not Justifiable? by Missy_Schmidt</title>
		<link>http://757hamptonroads.com/2010/10/07/economist-says-lrt-cost-not-justifiable/comment-page-1/#comment-3302</link>
		<dc:creator>Missy_Schmidt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 06:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://757hamptonroads.com/?p=939#comment-3302</guid>
		<description>hopefully, my write-up on both of Dr. Koch&#039;s public appearances covers a bit more than the papers: http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=286963299963&amp;id=101501718224

and here&#039;s the post HRTPO wrote:  http://www.hrtpo.org/chronicle/post/Over-200-atten-Virginia-Department-of-Rail-and-Public-Transportation-(DRPT)-Southeast-High-Speed-Rail-Corridor-Public-Information-Meeting-in-Norfolk.aspx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hopefully, my write-up on both of Dr. Koch&#8217;s public appearances covers a bit more than the papers: <a href="http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=286963299963&amp;id=101501718224" rel="nofollow">http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=286963299963&amp;id=101501718224</a></p>
<p>and here&#8217;s the post HRTPO wrote:  <a href="http://www.hrtpo.org/chronicle/post/Over-200-atten-Virginia-Department-of-Rail-and-Public-Transportation-(DRPT)-Southeast-High-Speed-Rail-Corridor-Public-Information-Meeting-in-Norfolk.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.hrtpo.org/chronicle/post/Over-200-atten-Virginia-Department-of-Rail-and-Public-Transportation-(DRPT)-Southeast-High-Speed-Rail-Corridor-Public-Information-Meeting-in-Norfolk.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My Trip to Portland by Michael Ragsdale</title>
		<link>http://757hamptonroads.com/2010/10/23/my-trip-to-portland/comment-page-1/#comment-3284</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Ragsdale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Oct 2010 22:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://757hamptonroads.com/?p=961#comment-3284</guid>
		<description>Way back when, Portland had a huge Freeway Revolt (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freeway_and_expressway_revolts)

This resulted in the MAX Blue Line.  At first, just like with The Tide, &quot;Light Rail will NEVER work in Portland&quot;, &quot;No one will ride it&quot;, etc.  You saw how packed your MAX trains were :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Way back when, Portland had a huge Freeway Revolt (see <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freeway_and_expressway_revolts)" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freeway_and_expressway_revolts)</a></p>
<p>This resulted in the MAX Blue Line.  At first, just like with The Tide, &#8220;Light Rail will NEVER work in Portland&#8221;, &#8220;No one will ride it&#8221;, etc.  You saw how packed your MAX trains were <img src='http://757hamptonroads.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ODU Predicts Poor Future for HR by Missy Schmidt</title>
		<link>http://757hamptonroads.com/2010/10/07/odu-predicts-poor-future-for-hr/comment-page-1/#comment-3027</link>
		<dc:creator>Missy Schmidt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2010 13:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://757hamptonroads.com/?p=931#comment-3027</guid>
		<description>The Regional Vision for Technology-Driven Prosperity in Hampton Roads By Joseph F. Bouchard, Ph.D.

Dr. Jim Koch, President Emeritus of Old Dominion University, delivered a much needed, yet unpleasant, dose of hard reality in his annual State of the Region address this week.  As was well reported in this newspaper [The Virginian-Pilot, October 7, “ODU economist predicts dour decade for Hampton Roads”] [Daily Press, October 6, “Hampton Roads economy: Recovery is slow, and the signs are worrisome”], his economic forecast for the region is mediocre, at best.  
Defense spending and employment are likely to decline – a serious blow given that defense spending makes up 45% of our regional economy.  Recovery in commercial and residential real estate sales and prices are likely to be modest and painfully slow.  And the port faces stiff competition from other East Coast ports and declining ability to move cargo efficiently due to the state’s inability to provide adequate funding for transportation.

Does all this mean we are condemned to mediocre economic growth?  Absolutely not.  
Do we have a way to overcome these challenges and ensure a prosperous future for our region? We do.

Hampton Roads already has the blueprint for economic success published in Vision Hampton Roads, the region’s comprehensive economic development strategy.   Led by the Hampton Roads Partnership and the Planning District Commission, it is the first region-wide roadmap of strategies and actions – to position the region as a leader in the global economy. The Vision experience is about engaging citizens and embracing ongoing region-wide economic development practices with a 21st century perspective, that is, to think globally, strategize regionally and act locally. 

While underscoring the importance of the existing three pillars of our regional economy – the military, the port and tourism – this bold strategy emphasizes the critical importance of diversifying our economy through technology-based economic development.  Additionally, the strategy calls for constantly scanning the horizon for future opportunities to complement the region’s existing technology clusters of Bio-Science, Energy, Modeling &amp; Simulation, Robotics and Sensors.
The Innovation sub-committee which helped develop Vision Hampton Roads has been established by the Partnership as a permanent Innovation Task Force to implement the plan’s objective of regional economic growth through promoting technological innovation and entrepreneurship.  Hampton Roads has a quarter of a million K-12 students, and Vision is an opportunity to start them on the best path for a future rife with technology and innovation.
The Task Force has two immediate missions.  First, to transform the decade old Hampton Roads Research Partnership into Innovate!HamptonRoads to unify the efforts of our region’s research institutions, economic and work force development agencies, technology clusters, technology incubators, and the technology council, Technology Hampton Roads (http://HRTC.org).  Working together as a cohesive team, these organizations will provide the programs, expertise and resources needed to nurture innovation and entrepreneurship across our region.

The Task Force’s second mission is to establish IdeaWorksHamptonRoads to strengthen and support the region’s technology incubators – vital breeding grounds for entrepreneurs.  IdeaWorks will support the incubators by providing critical support for individuals trying to bring new technology to market: protecting their intellectual property, commercializing their technology,  establishing an effective management team, creating a sound business plan, identifying customers, and, most difficult of all, attracting investors. 

As Dr. Koch pointed out, our region faces daunting challenges.  And through a concerted, sustained effort with broad regional support focused on creating a culture of innovation and entrepreneurship in Hampton Roads, we will succeed and flourish.  The future of our regional economy depends on the success of Vision Hampton Roads. 
Innovate!HamptonRoads and IdeaWorksHamptonRoads are the teams that will make that vision a reality.  The volunteers who make up these teams believe that contributing their time, efforts and expertise will transform Hampton Roads as the go-to place for people with great ideas.

Dr. Bouchard is the Chair of the Vision Hampton Roads Innovation Task Force.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Regional Vision for Technology-Driven Prosperity in Hampton Roads By Joseph F. Bouchard, Ph.D.</p>
<p>Dr. Jim Koch, President Emeritus of Old Dominion University, delivered a much needed, yet unpleasant, dose of hard reality in his annual State of the Region address this week.  As was well reported in this newspaper [The Virginian-Pilot, October 7, “ODU economist predicts dour decade for Hampton Roads”] [Daily Press, October 6, “Hampton Roads economy: Recovery is slow, and the signs are worrisome”], his economic forecast for the region is mediocre, at best.<br />
Defense spending and employment are likely to decline – a serious blow given that defense spending makes up 45% of our regional economy.  Recovery in commercial and residential real estate sales and prices are likely to be modest and painfully slow.  And the port faces stiff competition from other East Coast ports and declining ability to move cargo efficiently due to the state’s inability to provide adequate funding for transportation.</p>
<p>Does all this mean we are condemned to mediocre economic growth?  Absolutely not.<br />
Do we have a way to overcome these challenges and ensure a prosperous future for our region? We do.</p>
<p>Hampton Roads already has the blueprint for economic success published in Vision Hampton Roads, the region’s comprehensive economic development strategy.   Led by the Hampton Roads Partnership and the Planning District Commission, it is the first region-wide roadmap of strategies and actions – to position the region as a leader in the global economy. The Vision experience is about engaging citizens and embracing ongoing region-wide economic development practices with a 21st century perspective, that is, to think globally, strategize regionally and act locally. </p>
<p>While underscoring the importance of the existing three pillars of our regional economy – the military, the port and tourism – this bold strategy emphasizes the critical importance of diversifying our economy through technology-based economic development.  Additionally, the strategy calls for constantly scanning the horizon for future opportunities to complement the region’s existing technology clusters of Bio-Science, Energy, Modeling &amp; Simulation, Robotics and Sensors.<br />
The Innovation sub-committee which helped develop Vision Hampton Roads has been established by the Partnership as a permanent Innovation Task Force to implement the plan’s objective of regional economic growth through promoting technological innovation and entrepreneurship.  Hampton Roads has a quarter of a million K-12 students, and Vision is an opportunity to start them on the best path for a future rife with technology and innovation.<br />
The Task Force has two immediate missions.  First, to transform the decade old Hampton Roads Research Partnership into Innovate!HamptonRoads to unify the efforts of our region’s research institutions, economic and work force development agencies, technology clusters, technology incubators, and the technology council, Technology Hampton Roads (<a href="http://HRTC.org" rel="nofollow">http://HRTC.org</a>).  Working together as a cohesive team, these organizations will provide the programs, expertise and resources needed to nurture innovation and entrepreneurship across our region.</p>
<p>The Task Force’s second mission is to establish IdeaWorksHamptonRoads to strengthen and support the region’s technology incubators – vital breeding grounds for entrepreneurs.  IdeaWorks will support the incubators by providing critical support for individuals trying to bring new technology to market: protecting their intellectual property, commercializing their technology,  establishing an effective management team, creating a sound business plan, identifying customers, and, most difficult of all, attracting investors. </p>
<p>As Dr. Koch pointed out, our region faces daunting challenges.  And through a concerted, sustained effort with broad regional support focused on creating a culture of innovation and entrepreneurship in Hampton Roads, we will succeed and flourish.  The future of our regional economy depends on the success of Vision Hampton Roads.<br />
Innovate!HamptonRoads and IdeaWorksHamptonRoads are the teams that will make that vision a reality.  The volunteers who make up these teams believe that contributing their time, efforts and expertise will transform Hampton Roads as the go-to place for people with great ideas.</p>
<p>Dr. Bouchard is the Chair of the Vision Hampton Roads Innovation Task Force.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Chesapeake&#8217;s New Red Light Camera by Mike</title>
		<link>http://757hamptonroads.com/2010/08/23/chesapeakes-new-red-light-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-3026</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Oct 2010 19:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://757hamptonroads.com/?p=835#comment-3026</guid>
		<description>Folks - there are no points or car registration related connections to red light camera violations in Virginia - see the statute for yourself at va code section 15.2-968.1.

Further, the 2005 VDOT red light camera report confirms that you can throw away your mail-order red light camera tickets and not face arrest or proceedings for contempt fo court unless you are PERSONALLY served:

See http://www.thenewspaper.com/rlc/docs/05-vdot.pdf:

SNIP

In more detail, the 2005 RLC VDOT report on page 110 explains this as follows:
 
&quot;The new statute referenced in section A., § 8.01-296, is the provision for service of
process in civil actions, which has been borrowed by the Virginia General Assembly for the
present purpose. It outlines several options for achieving satisfactory service, beginning with an
attempt at personal in-hand service, and moving on to a series of de-escalating forms of
substituted service: delivering to an adult at the defendant’s usual place of abode; posting on the
front door of such abode in conjunction with mailing; and finally, by order of publication in
appropriate cases under the provisions of the applicable code sections. It is the second of these
that gives Virginia its nickname as a “nail and mail” state, meaning that for most civil actions,
posting notice on the defendant’s front door in conjunction with mailing will constitute sufficient
notice. However, this is not so for red light camera citations under the code, for the second
statute referenced above is § 19.2-76 which, as we have already seen, requires personal in-hand
service if the “nail and mail” approach does not succeed in bringing the defendant into court.
Thus, under Virginia’s red light camera statute as it is now worded, the mere mailing of a
citation without personal service by a law enforcement officer does not constitute sufficient
notice under the statute’s own terms. While the statute permits the jurisdiction to make the
initial attempt to summon the accused to court via mail, if that person fails to respond, he or she
is not considered to have been satisfactorily served with notice. Default judgments entered under
such circumstances (when the defendant fails to appear in court on the appointed return date)
would thus not be binding, and the defendant could not be charged with contempt for failing to
comply with such a judgment. Hence, despite its ostensive distancing from the requirements of
Va. Code Ann. § 19.2-76, Virginia’s red light camera statute comes full circle and, in the end,
requires personal service before a default judgment may be entered against no-shows.&quot;
 
This statutory scheme is a bit convoluted - but that was probably **done on purpose** by opponents of RLCs as a poison pill that many pro-RLC legislators were not aware of b/c it is a complicated do-loop.] or chose to just look the other way.
 
As the 2005 RLC VDOT report states in Appendix H:  Virginia&#039;s red light camera law &quot;ultimately requires a personal notification, which may prove prohibitively expensive for some jurisdictions.&quot;
 
the only way to slow down growth of RLC installations in Virginia is to scare localities with the potential for budget problems should they put these cameras up - if everyone knows they can blow off the mail order tickets as well as tickets tacked to their door or handed to their spouse at the house, then the profit potential for RLCs goes down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Folks &#8211; there are no points or car registration related connections to red light camera violations in Virginia &#8211; see the statute for yourself at va code section 15.2-968.1.</p>
<p>Further, the 2005 VDOT red light camera report confirms that you can throw away your mail-order red light camera tickets and not face arrest or proceedings for contempt fo court unless you are PERSONALLY served:</p>
<p>See <a href="http://www.thenewspaper.com/rlc/docs/05-vdot.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.thenewspaper.com/rlc/docs/05-vdot.pdf</a>:</p>
<p>SNIP</p>
<p>In more detail, the 2005 RLC VDOT report on page 110 explains this as follows:</p>
<p>&#8220;The new statute referenced in section A., § 8.01-296, is the provision for service of<br />
process in civil actions, which has been borrowed by the Virginia General Assembly for the<br />
present purpose. It outlines several options for achieving satisfactory service, beginning with an<br />
attempt at personal in-hand service, and moving on to a series of de-escalating forms of<br />
substituted service: delivering to an adult at the defendant’s usual place of abode; posting on the<br />
front door of such abode in conjunction with mailing; and finally, by order of publication in<br />
appropriate cases under the provisions of the applicable code sections. It is the second of these<br />
that gives Virginia its nickname as a “nail and mail” state, meaning that for most civil actions,<br />
posting notice on the defendant’s front door in conjunction with mailing will constitute sufficient<br />
notice. However, this is not so for red light camera citations under the code, for the second<br />
statute referenced above is § 19.2-76 which, as we have already seen, requires personal in-hand<br />
service if the “nail and mail” approach does not succeed in bringing the defendant into court.<br />
Thus, under Virginia’s red light camera statute as it is now worded, the mere mailing of a<br />
citation without personal service by a law enforcement officer does not constitute sufficient<br />
notice under the statute’s own terms. While the statute permits the jurisdiction to make the<br />
initial attempt to summon the accused to court via mail, if that person fails to respond, he or she<br />
is not considered to have been satisfactorily served with notice. Default judgments entered under<br />
such circumstances (when the defendant fails to appear in court on the appointed return date)<br />
would thus not be binding, and the defendant could not be charged with contempt for failing to<br />
comply with such a judgment. Hence, despite its ostensive distancing from the requirements of<br />
Va. Code Ann. § 19.2-76, Virginia’s red light camera statute comes full circle and, in the end,<br />
requires personal service before a default judgment may be entered against no-shows.&#8221;</p>
<p>This statutory scheme is a bit convoluted &#8211; but that was probably **done on purpose** by opponents of RLCs as a poison pill that many pro-RLC legislators were not aware of b/c it is a complicated do-loop.] or chose to just look the other way.</p>
<p>As the 2005 RLC VDOT report states in Appendix H:  Virginia&#8217;s red light camera law &#8220;ultimately requires a personal notification, which may prove prohibitively expensive for some jurisdictions.&#8221;</p>
<p>the only way to slow down growth of RLC installations in Virginia is to scare localities with the potential for budget problems should they put these cameras up &#8211; if everyone knows they can blow off the mail order tickets as well as tickets tacked to their door or handed to their spouse at the house, then the profit potential for RLCs goes down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Economist Says LRT Cost Not Justifiable? by 757HR</title>
		<link>http://757hamptonroads.com/2010/10/07/economist-says-lrt-cost-not-justifiable/comment-page-1/#comment-3024</link>
		<dc:creator>757HR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 01:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://757hamptonroads.com/?p=939#comment-3024</guid>
		<description>absolutely agree. I actually probably will not get a post on that passenger rail meeting, since I had to work and was unable to go to the meeting :( if somebody else who attended wants to write a thought out post about it, I&#039;m game to post it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>absolutely agree. I actually probably will not get a post on that passenger rail meeting, since I had to work and was unable to go to the meeting <img src='http://757hamptonroads.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' />  if somebody else who attended wants to write a thought out post about it, I&#8217;m game to post it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Economist Says LRT Cost Not Justifiable? by t1ewis</title>
		<link>http://757hamptonroads.com/2010/10/07/economist-says-lrt-cost-not-justifiable/comment-page-1/#comment-3023</link>
		<dc:creator>t1ewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 17:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://757hamptonroads.com/?p=939#comment-3023</guid>
		<description>i always say, if u don&#039;t have a better solution, then shut ur mouth and sit down (VP)  also, are u gonna do an entry about the recent meeting they had in Norfolk about the conventional speed rail?  that&#039;s another issue that there&#039;s a lot of haters (lol, that&#039;s what i call them anyway)  but i find it interesting (referring to the conventional speed rail meeting) that when individuals make these comments, they always say &quot;we&quot; and &quot;us&quot;.  but in truth, not everybody in that room is thinking like &quot;YOU&quot;.  my other complaint is just cuz ur retired and don&#039;t have to take the interstate doesn&#039;t mean that everybody can do the same as u, duh?  this goes along with ur other entry about the future of HR.  all this place would be is a giant retirement community if something isn&#039;t done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i always say, if u don&#8217;t have a better solution, then shut ur mouth and sit down (VP)  also, are u gonna do an entry about the recent meeting they had in Norfolk about the conventional speed rail?  that&#8217;s another issue that there&#8217;s a lot of haters (lol, that&#8217;s what i call them anyway)  but i find it interesting (referring to the conventional speed rail meeting) that when individuals make these comments, they always say &#8220;we&#8221; and &#8220;us&#8221;.  but in truth, not everybody in that room is thinking like &#8220;YOU&#8221;.  my other complaint is just cuz ur retired and don&#8217;t have to take the interstate doesn&#8217;t mean that everybody can do the same as u, duh?  this goes along with ur other entry about the future of HR.  all this place would be is a giant retirement community if something isn&#8217;t done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

